GEMLab
/
RaceCriticalTheories
16
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Update 'content/syllabus/fifthsyllabustest.md'

This commit is contained in:
Teagan C. Lance 2021-09-08 08:34:40 -07:00
parent ac4cb1a52d
commit 474a425ee9
1 changed files with 16 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
content/syllabus/fifthsyllabustest.md
View File

@ -31,19 +31,27 @@ This section covers roughly minutes 9-19 of the complete film:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AeKKeiXTBos" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
[Man With a Movie Camera, Part 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeKKeiXTBos), (~9m 00 to 19m 00.)
> [Man With a Movie Camera, Part 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeKKeiXTBos), (~9m 00 to 19m 00).
Nearly 21 minutes in, a sequence commences featuring the Camera Operator (presumably Mikhail Kaufman, Vertov’s younger brother and principal cameraman during this time) perched dangerously atop a moving car as he photographs the passengers in nearby horse-drawn carriages. The Cameraman furiously cranks his camera, propelling it into action, obsessively capturing the images before him. His gestures are explicitly masturbatory—the Camera is manically tugged upon (dziga, dziga, dziga…) as the operator hunches over his tool of capture, power, and domination. When a lady passenger mimics the crude crank-gesturing back at the Cameraman, is he embarrassed or intimidated? No, for he is in control! It is clear that Vertov’s technique is beyond mere voyeurism. There is nothing covert about his Cameraman’s imposition on his subjects. His camera has empowered him to subjugate them in a way. Vertov presents a series of images as still frames immediately following the precarious carriage sequence—these images of carriage passengers are held for several seconds each (including one frightfully unattractive portrait of the indignant gesturing woman), exemplifying the filmmaker’s power. Having tagged and dominated these subjects with his Kino-tool, their images have become his captives. It is now the filmmaker’s privilege to exhibit them as he fancies!
## “Part 3” of *Man With a Movie Camera*
This section covers roughly minutes 20-29 of the complete film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2RKlDFmui4
This section covers roughly minutes 20-29 of the complete film:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/u2RKlDFmui4" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
> [Man With a Movie Camera, Part 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2RKlDFmui4), (~20m 00 to 29m 00).
Vertov’s ardent belief in the synthesis between humanity and technology pervaded every aspect of his work. “We: Variant of a Manifesto,” written in 1922, boldly proclaims: “Our path leads through the poetry of machines, from the bungling citizen to the perfect electric man,” [^3] precisely heralding the mechanical super-humanity he would present in Man with a Movie Camera, several years later. In Hard Core, Linda Williams’ seminal study of pornography, she describes A Country Stud Horse (1920), an early American stag film where a man stands at a mutoscope with his face pressed against the viewing interface to watch a striptease. [^4] Cutting directly to closeups of the stripper’s naked body, the film privileges the viewer with a sort of super-human sight, offering closer views than would be realistically available to the man at the mutoscope. The film repeatedly cuts back to reveal the male voyeur manually propelling the crank-powered mutoscope with one hand while masturbating with the other. This early example of human sexuality being bolstered by a cine-mechanical aid points directly toward Vertov’s vision of an improved human experience through technological innovation.
Vertov’s goal to actually see the world better through cinema can be easily interpreted as a manifestation of what Michel Foucault calls scientia sexualis, humanity’s basic impulse to detail an increasingly scientific understanding of sexuality. [^5] “I am kino-eye, I am a mechanical eye. I, a machine, show you the world as only I can see it,” writes Vertov in 1923. [^6] Though he does not actually delve into pornography in any way, his efforts convey the same will to knowledge/power that motivate our scientia sexualis—he maps the modern city with the same care and passion he devotes to the study of a woman dressing in the morning. His project assumes what Linda Williams defines as the principle of maximum visibility: a compulsive desire to show all, to find the best formal techniques and applications to explore one’s subject. [^7] Vertov certainly shares this fundamental compulsion that is so essential to hard-core narrative pornography—his desire to explore the mechanisms of modern city-living is the same impulse that motivates the pornographer to find the best way to represent genitalia, intercourse, and drives his impossible quest to depict actual consummation, the most life-affirming, yet visually elusive moment of all.
## “Part 7” of *Man With a Movie Camera*
This section covers roughly minutes 50-59 of the complete film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8HiRQjEhF4
This section covers roughly minutes 50-59 of the complete film:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/L8HiRQjEhF4" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
> [Man With a Movie Camera, Part 7](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8HiRQjEhF4), (~50m 00 to 59m 00).
Beginning 25 minutes in, and continuing with much more prowess later on, we see the Camera appearing to act independently. Perched high above a busy city intersection, the camera pans (seemingly of its own accord) across the scene, glaring down upon its subjects. At 55 minutes, we see the Camera and Camera Operator superimposed upon the skyline of the city, towering above it, surveying the fiefdom that cowers beneath them. A few minutes later, depicted through the skilful application of stop-motion photography, the Camera (now appearing without its Operator) leaps from its case onto the tripod mount and begins to dance around. Clearly, the Camera itself is the film’s star, the truly principal figure. Despite this cheeky bit of animation, the viewer understands that the Camera is merely an appendage of its Operator; and yet, this tool is indispensable, as the Cock is to the Cocksman in pornography.
@ -54,7 +62,11 @@ Vertov’s Camera casts its gaze upon every detail, from the most magnificent to
Mark how the fevered pace of Vertov’s montage responds to the increased intensity of the hand-cranking Cameraman as the film builds toward this climax! The quick succession of shots is itself orgasmic, as charging trains intercut with floods of micro pedestrians gushing through the streets! Each image itself a blast of semen! Each exploding upon the last, raging toward sheer ecstasy and complete satisfaction! This climax, this ultimate act of sublimation is a pure celebration of cinema! Each shot an affirmation of life, each blast a little gob of humanity! Cinema itself is bursting, ejaculating the cities of Eastern Europe upon the crowd! Oh, the spoils of the filmmaker! The—oh, Oh—OH! OH FUCK! Oh.
## “Part 8” of *Man With a Movie Camera*
This section covers roughly minutes 60-68 of the complete film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sON2MxgFnE
This section covers roughly minutes 60-68 of the complete film:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2sON2MxgFnE" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
[Man With a Movie Camera, Part 7](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sON2MxgFnE), (~60m 00 to 68m 00).
<br>